Exhibit 30.5 FMCG Retail Universe (an example).
Exhibit 30.6 Nielsen’s retail universe (2008) excludes rural
areas and the sparsely populated Western region of China.
Among the various classes of goods, Fast Moving Consumer
Goods (FMCG) stands out as the most complex in terms of distribution. At the broadest level, as
shown in Exhibit 30.5, FMCG distribution can be categorized as
the upper trade and the lower trade.
The upper trade, which refers to the organized sector or modern trade, comprises
store formats such as supermarkets like Walmart, Tesco and Carrefour; convenience stores like
7-Eleven, Circle K and Lawson; and personal care and health outlets like Boots, Walgreens and
Watsons.
On the other hand, the lower trade consists of a diverse array of traditional,
independent stores, including provision stores and sundry kiosks.
Notably, despite representing a mere 1.6% of the total number of stores in Asia
based on Nielsen’s estimates, the upper trade accounts for a significant 53% of total FMCG sales
in terms of value. In the more developed markets of Europe, North America and the Pacific, the
contribution of the upper trade to overall FMCG sales is substantially larger.
Tracking FMCG products presents various challenges. Accessing certain locations,
including schools, offices, tourist destinations, hotels, bars, construction sites, army camps,
and transient hawkers, can be difficult for the service provider. Moreover, there may be
instances where chain stores decline to participate in the tracking service. In large countries
like China (as shown in Exhibit 30.6), the cost of covering
the entire geographic area can be prohibitively high, resulting in the exclusion of less densely
populated provinces and villages from the service coverage.
The retail universe is therefore a subset of the
real world and should be clearly defined by the service provider. This
definition typically provides an outline of the channels and geographical areas
that are covered as well as those that are excluded.
Exhibit 30.7 Coverage gap is the shortfall in the retail index
sales estimate for a product.
The shortfall in the retail index sales estimate
for a product is the called the coverage gap (refer
to Exhibit 30.7). It is usually represented as a ratio — i.e., the measured
purchase volume as a proportion of the firm’s total shipments within the
market.
The shortfall is due to two factors:
- The difference in the product’s sales area and the agency’s
universe, and
- The difference between agency’s sales estimate
and the brand’s shipments to the agency’s universe. The ratio, agency’s
sales estimate/ shipments to universe, is referred to as
pick-up.
Analysis of coverage is covered in detail with some case examples, in
Section Coverage Analysis.